24/7 SystemsSoftware Web Services for Reliability Management |
Contact Us | Customer Login |
|
Condition Management |
|
The objective on Tango's Condition Management function is to facilitate the "Elimination of Failures in Service." |
|
|
In Service Failures on Critical Plant Equipment can be eliminated by the rigorous application of condition monitoring (PdM), physical inspections and special testing of plant equipment. This approach is often called Condition Based Maintenance. TangoTM provides a systematic approach that allows you to achieve integration, communications, accountability and performance metrics in your condition based maintenance program. For More Information View: Managing Reliability Across the Corporation Bridge Between Condition Monitoring and Maintenance
|
![]() Figure 101: Condition Management Flow Chart |
|
|
|
TangoTM Integration Condition Reporting for work order generation helps you bridge the gap between condition data and maintenance action. |
|
Figure 102: TangoTM Equipment Condition Information Management |
| Often it is difficult for a plant to
consistently move from condition data that indicates a
machinery problem to successful, timely repair of the
equipment. Problems that interfere with the
process are the usual suspects: Information
integration, communications and accountability.
Many large industrial facilities have wrestled with
these problems and over time have evolved technologies for
improving their record of performance.
TangoTM provides a web based condition management system which allows condition analysts to enter each condition problem and then integrates their results with information from other technologies, providing a complete view of the equipment conditions. The TangoTM Reliability Dashboard displays all pending critical problems, their severity, aging and work order status. TangoTM provides a standardized condition entry form (Figure 105) for analysts to enter their evaluation of equipment problems. The condition entry form is the same format for all condition technologies and analysis results in actionable information which is ready for use by plant maintenance and management. Plants using TangoTM typically use the Integrated Report (Figure 106) as a planning and prioritization tool. Often this report is projected in weekly staff meeting as and reviewed in detail. From the TangoTM Integration Condition Report Details view, TangoTM allows a maintenance planner to create a work order by copying information from TangoTM into the plant CMMS or by an automated interface which creates a work order and receives the resulting work orders. Once a work order is created, there may be many operational and logistical reason it is not immediately scheduled for execution. TangoTM provides an easy to view summary of open work orders, the length of time since the condition problem was entered and the work order number for each condition problem. |
|
|
|
TangoTM Provides Communication & Accountability |
|
"Plants often struggle with knowing how well condition monitoring results are being used to drive maintenance execution." |
|
Many industrial plants have technically
proficient predictive maintenance programs using
technologies such as vibration analysis, IR thermography
and motor testing. However, those same plants
often struggle with knowing how well condition
monitoring results are used to drive maintenance
execution. All too often a plant's condition monitoring team (or service contractor) may report on the same equipment health problem time after time for many months, yet the maintenance organization does not respond until the equipment actually fails. Successful condition-based maintenance organization create accountability for resolving condition-based work requests. The metrics begin with the Integrated Condition Status Report (ICSR). Users can sort to show the highest severity or criticality issues at the top, and planners can interact with the report to show that work orders have been issued or completed. This interaction makes it convenient to update work order status, and that in turn provides current information every time a user opens the ICAR. The "Days Awaiting Checkoff" column provides an aging statement showing how long each identified problem has been open; the Work Order Status" and "Work Order Numbers" columns show whether or not work orders have been generated, and the reference number from the plant's CMMS./ The broad distribution of this status information helps drive the accountability mentioned earlier. Once all the condition driven work orders for an asset component have been closed, the "Close Entry" button alerts users that it is time for a follow-up measurement to confirm that the problem has been eliminated. |
|
Figure 103: Integrated Condition Status Report |
|
Figure 104: Condition Entry Trend Analysis |
|
|
|
Measuring Performance |
|
Measuring
Condition-Based Maintenance Effectiveness with TangoTM
Web Service - Part 1 Measuring Condition-Based Maintenance Effectiveness with TangoTM Web Service - Part 2 |
|
|
|
TangoTM Condition Entries Standardize the Reporting of Equipment Condition Problems |
| Just as in human medicine, it is very
important that all parties use common terminology when
describing machinery health issues.
Standardization of condition results mean that everyone
inputting findings and recommendations use common
equipment location names, faults, and severity levels,
and that the output information has a standard look and
content regardless of technology analyst, or whether
they're plant employees or an outside contractor. Tango's condition entry function provides a results entry form (Figure 105) that uses pull down lists to enforce standardized terminology. This screen utilizes a standard pull down list for the selection of faults, recommendations and severity. The pull down lists also enforce brevity to make the information easier to understand; an analyst can also write a more comprehensive problem description if needed. Such standardization allows a common look and language between condition technologies, and it also facilitates future mining of the information for common patterns. This simple mechanism for standardizing basic finding and recommendation contact does not exclude technical reporting, as supporting data images and documents can be linked to the condition entry, for retrieval by interested users. |
|
Figure 105: Condition Entry Form |
| Tango TM may be used to define condition assessment tasks for specific monitoring technologies and plant areas. |
|
Figure 106: Condition Entry Form Detail |
| For example, the monthly vibration analysis for the utilities area of the quarterly oil analysis may be defined in a TangoTM Condition Assessment Task. Task results are specified from a menu of states. These states allow the user to define the machine's state at the time of monitoring. Every task item must be assessed before the task can be closed, so items missed or down must have that state assigned to them. History of the component's health may be maintained and components which have been missed are maintained in a special list for "at risk" components, in need of assessment. |
|
Figure 107: Condition Assessment Task Management |
| Managing Condition Monitoring Contractors with TangoTM Reliability Management Service |
|
|
|
IR & Ultrasonic Assessment tasks can be loaded into a PDA data collection routing. |
|
| TangoTM Web Service, in
conjunction with handheld PDS's can provide well defined
survey management along with an audit trail for problems
found and assets not monitored. In addition, since
TangoTM Web Service utilizes a web-hosted
database on a server so that outside plant's IT
firewall, IR service contractors can use the system and
fall under this structured survey management. The service contractor downloads a survey task into his handheld PDA then follows the PDA screen through the sequence of panels to be scanned. A bar code scan ensures that the IR information is being entered for the correct asset. He confirms the asset has sufficiently loaded for a good scan, then enters the results of that scan:
|
![]() Figure 108: Download Survey Task to PDA |
![]() Figure 109: Inputting Status through PDA Screen |
For problems requiring a condition
entry, the contractor references the IR and visual
images captured by the infrared system. Once the
survey is complete, the information is uploaded from the
PDA to TangoTM. Condition entries are
complete for problems found, and those results are
integrated with problems found by other condition
monitoring technologies. Authorized TangoTM
Web Service users can now view the updated Integrated
Condition Status through their web browser. A plant or corporate reliability engineer can monitor the quality and completeness of the contractor's IR work through the task summary report. This audits how many assets were scanned, which were not scanned and what problems are being found. |
|
|
|
|
OilographyTM provides oil sample management, secondary analysis and TangoTM condition reporting. |
|
|
42/7 Systems has added OilographyTM,
a web-based oil analysis management system to our family
of Reliability Information Management tools.
OilographyTM provides solutions for these oil
program issues:
A review of this exciting new web-based oil analysis management system is available for you consideration. |
|
|
Figure 110: Oilography Sample Management Diagram |
|
| View the Oilography Brochure Here | |